|
Watson
First Thoughts
Sept 18, 2008
Call it Palin-tology – the study of truthfulness by a here-to-fore unknown political candidate, vice presidential hopeful Sarah Palin.
It follows other political courses like Obama-tology, Biden-tology and McCain-tology, referring to Barack Obama, Joe Biden and John McCain, candidates already vetted.
Just how truthful are the words of our candidates? The First Amendment protects noble speech, truthful speech , even stupid speech. Unfortunately, it also protects speech that is untruthful. As Star editor Dennis Ryerson said in a recent column, it’s important for Americans to hold political speech to a truthfulness litmus test.
It is difficult in this age of high-priced TV ads to discern the truthfulness of our over-funded candidates.
Rampant bomb-throwing proliferates, much of it irresponsible. Consider as a tool a web site called www.politifact.com, a product of the diligent reporting staffs of the Pulitzer Prize winning St. Petersburg Times and its affiliate Congressional Quarterly. The site seeks to decipher sketchy claims by the candidates.
The GOP candidates team of McCain and Palin, fortified by chain emailers speaking on their behalf, have dominated the Politifact news as political handlers seek to shape the image of the vice presidential hopeful. You’ll learn Politifact that both McCain and Palin have fudged their claims that they have opposed pork-barrel spending in Arizona and Alaska, respectively. You’ll also learn that Democrat presidential candidate Obama never called Palin a “pig.”
By the same token, the factcheckers discovered that Palin never sought to have books banned in her town, as email chain letters allege. You’ll also find that Obama is not Muslim, as others suggest.
As the election approaches, the pace of the smears and half-truths will no doubt increase. Remember, it’s up to all of us to seek truth.
|